1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 554 F.3d
  5. 554 F.3d 1001 (2009)
 

SUD-CHEMIE, INC. v. MULTISORB TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 2008-1247.

554 F.3d 1001 (2009)

SÜD-CHEMIE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MULTISORB TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 30, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin M. O'Brien, Baker & McKenzie LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Kevin J. Sullivan and Thomas A. Doyle, and James J. Dries, of Chicago, Illinois.

Michael R. McGee, McGee and Gelman, of Buffalo, New York, argued for defendant-appellee.

Before RADER, FRIEDMAN, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Desiccant containers are frequently used to maintain a dry environment for products during storage or shipping. Some desiccants function by absorbing water vapor and undergoing a phase change into liquid form. Leakage of the liquid from the desiccant container would defeat the purpose of the desiccant and could damage either the products that are being maintained in a dry environment or the container

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases