AARON v. MAHL

Nos. 07-4004, 08-2020.

550 F.3d 659 (2008)

Jim AARON, Plaintiff, v. Susan J. MAHL, Defendant-Appellant, v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided December 18, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald D. Foster, Attorney (argued), South Bend, IN, for Plaintiff Jim Aaron.

Patrick D. Murphy, Attorney (argued), Boveri Murphy Rice & Ladue, South Bend, IN, for Defendant-Appellee Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith.

Michael P. Quinlivan, Attorney (argued), Kouns, Quinlivan & Severson, San Jose, CA, Robert V. Mathison, Jr., Attorney (argued), Mathison & Mathison, Hilton Head Island, SC, for Defendant-Appellant Susan J. Mahl.

Before BAUER, WOOD, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.


TINDER, Circuit Judge.

Susan Mahl and Jim Aaron were live-in lovers in southern California in the late 1990s. But the romance only lasted until 2001 when Aaron left Mahl for another woman. However, for the past seven years or so, Aaron has been arduously pursuing Mahl, from California to Indiana and then South Carolina; but sadly, not because he is having second thoughts about the demise of their relationship — as you will soon learn, he has quite a different...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases