1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 548 F.3d
  5. 548 F.3d 1094 (2008)
 

U.S. v. TURNER

No. 07-3107.

548 F.3d 1094 (2008)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Peter R. TURNER, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 5, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Luk, appointed by the court, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Michele J. Woods, appointed by the court.

Edward P. Sullivan, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for appellee. On the brief were Daniel A. Petalas and Ann C. Brickley, Attorneys. Roy W. McLeese III, Assistant U.S. Attorney, entered an appearance.

Dissenting Opinion by Circuit Judge TATEL.

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:

The main issue in this appeal from a conviction, after a jury trial, is whether the sentence imposed on the defendant, Peter R. Turner, violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution. U.S. CONST. art. I, § 9. Turner also raises the question whether the prosecution established his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence, viewed in favor of the verdict, shows that there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases