U.S.O. CORP. v. MIZUHO HOLDING CO.

No. 07-3588.

547 F.3d 749 (2008)

U.S.O. CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIZUHO HOLDING COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 28, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reid M. Figel (argued), Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Yasuhiro Saito (argued), Hughes, Hubbard & Reed, New York, NY, David M. Simon, Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, Lawrence Benjamin, Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before POSNER, RIPPLE, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.


POSNER, Circuit Judge.

This diversity suit, in federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2)(C), charges conversion by affiliated Japanese entities that we'll refer to collectively as "the bank." The district judge dismissed the suit on the basis of the doctrine of forum non conveniens. That venerable judge-made doctrine, securely a part of federal common law, authorizes a court to dismiss a suit if making the defendant defend in that court rather than in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases