U.S. v. BHATIA

No. 07-10424.

545 F.3d 757 (2008)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lal BHATIA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed September 24, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley G. Hilton, Esq., Law Offices of Stanley G. Hilton, San Francisco, CA, for the defendant-appellant.

Joseph P. Russoniello, United States Attorney, Hartley M.K. West, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Barbara J. Valliere, Chief, Appellate Section, San Francisco, CA, Stephen G. Corrigan, Assistant United States Attorney, Oakland, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: EUGENE E. SILER, JR., M. MARGARET McKEOWN, and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.


McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

The issue we consider is whether there was privity between the government and a third party in a civil fraud action sufficient to bar a subsequent criminal prosecution of Lal Bhatia for wire fraud and money laundering. Bhatia argues that because the government took the "laboring oar" in the civil action, there was sufficient privity for application of res judicata and collateral estoppel. The facts do not support such a claim. Instead, Bhatia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases