AYERS v. STATE

Nos. 646, 2013, 667, 2013.

97 A.3d 1037 (2014)

Dashawn AYERS, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Michael E. Demby, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. State of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: July 21, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin A. Schwartz, Esquire (argued), Schwartz & Schwartz, Attorneys at Law, P.A., Dover, Delaware for Appellant Dashawn Ayers.

André M. Beauregard, Esquire (argued), Brown, Shiels & Beauregard, LLC, Dover, Delaware for Appellant Michael E. Demby.

Andrew J. Vella, Esquire (argued), Department of Justice, Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellee State of Delaware.

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices.


BERGER, Justice:

In this consolidated appeal we consider, among other things, whether the admission of wiretap recordings in a criminal trial violated appellants' confrontation rights under our state or federal constitutions. Appellants contend that the recordings were "testimonial" because two witnesses explained the meaning of the codes used in the recorded conversations, and appellants were unable to cross-examine the declarants about the coded language. We hold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases