1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. WILHELM v. MARSTON
 

WILHELM v. MARSTON

C.A. No. 12C-06-015 DCS.

GEORGE E. WILHELM and PAMELA A. WILHELM, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD E. MARSTON, ESQUIRE and DOROSHOW PASQUALE KRAWITZ & BHAYA, Defendants.

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County.

Decided: November 20, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin William Gibson, Esquire , Gibson & Perkins PC, Media, Pennsylvania, Attorney for Plaintiff.

Paul M. Lukoff, Esquire and Douglass Cummings, Esquire , Wilks, Lukoff & Bracegirdle, LLC Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Defendants.

OPINION

STREETT, J.

Introduction

Defendants Donald E. Marston, Esquire ("Mr. Marston") and the law firm of Doroshow Pasquale Krawitz & Bhaya (the "law firm") have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 56(c). Defendants contend that the legal malpractice claim, asserted by the Plaintiffs George E. Wilhelm ("Mr. Wilhelm") and his wife, Pamela E. Wilhelm, is barred by the statute of limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases