ARRANTS v. HOME DEPOT

No. 662, 2012.

65 A.3d 601 (2013)

Stephen ARRANTS, Claimant Below, Appellant, v. The HOME DEPOT, Employer Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: May 7, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael I. Silverman, Esquire and D. Miika Roggio, Esquire , Silverman, McDonald & Friedman, Wilmington, Delaware, for appellant.

Scott A. Simpson, Esquire and Elissa A. Greenberg, Esquire , Elzufon, Austin, Tarlov & Mondell, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware, for appellee.

Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices.


HOLLAND, Justice:

The claimant-appellant, Stephen Arrants ("Arrants" or "Claimant"), appeals from a Superior Court Order affirming the Industrial Accident Board's (the "Board") order granting the employer-appellee's, Home Depot's ("Home Depot"), petition to terminate Arrants' total disability benefits. Arrants raises two claims on appeal. First, he argues that the Board's decision was in error because all experts agreed that his condition had not improved since the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases