KEENER v. ISKEN

No. 609, 2011.

58 A.3d 407 (2013)

James H. KEENER and Xtreme Construction, Inc., Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Paul ISKEN and Joan Isken, Defendants Below, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: January 2, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Lee Wentz, Esquire , Wilmington, Delaware for Appellants.

Sean T. O'Kelly, Esquire and Ryan M. Ernst, Esquire , O'Kelly Ernst Bielli & Wallen, LLC, Wilmington, Delaware for Appellees.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.


BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal, we consider whether the Superior Court abused its discretion in refusing to reopen a summary judgment entered against appellants after they missed the deadline for filing a response to appellees' motion. Appellants mistakenly believed that they had 20 additional days to respond because appellees filed supplemental materials two weeks after filing their motion. The trial court apparently accepted the fact that appellants had made a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases