1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 60 A.3d
  5. 60 A.3d 1080 (2012)
 

PAUL v. PAUL

No. 284, 2012.

60 A.3d 1080 (2012)

Joseph PAUL, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. Shannon PAUL, Respondent Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: December 10, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathryn J. Laffey, Esquire and Shauna T. Hagan, Esquire , Kelleher & Laffey, Wilmington, DE, for Appellant.

John A. Clark, III, Esquire , Scott E. Swenson, Esquire and Mary I. Akhimien, Esquire , Connnolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Appellee.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices.

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal we consider the meaning of the term "regularly residing" as used in Delaware's alimony statute. The Family Court denied appellant's petition to terminate alimony, finding that appellee and her companion were not permanently or continuously residing together. The trial court focused on the fact that appellee and her companion maintained separate homes, and the absence of evidence as to whether they spent the majority of their free time...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases