1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 41 A.3d
  5. 41 A.3d 416 (2012)
 

PANUSKI v. STATE

No. 331, 2011.

41 A.3d 416 (2012)

William R. PANUSKI, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: March 30, 2012.

Reargument Denied April 19, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Panuski , pro se.

Elizabeth A. Powers, Esquire , Department of Justice, Wilmington, Delaware, for appellee.

Before HOLLAND, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices.

HOLLAND, Justice:

The defendant-appellant, William Panuski ("Panuski"), proceeding pro se, appeals from a Superior Court order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Panuski moved for postconviction relief on five grounds: first, violation of due process due to insufficient evidence; second, violation of double jeopardy; third, ineffective assistance of counsel; fourth, abuse of prosecutorial discretion; and fifth, "contradictive and ambiguous" colloquy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases