1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 977 A.2d
  5. 977 A.2d 797 (2009)
 

DEJESUS v. STATE

No. 600, 2008.

977 A.2d 797 (2009)

Daniel DEJESUS, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: July 16, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew J. Witherell, Esquire, Wilmington, DE, for appellant.

James T. Wakley, Esquire, Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE, for appellee.

Before HOLLAND, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices.

HOLLAND, Justice:

The defendant-appellant, Daniel Dejesus, appeals from the Superior Court's judgment that he violated the terms of his probation. Dejesus contends that the State produced insufficient evidence at the Violation of Probation ("VOP") hearing for the Superior Court to find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he violated the terms of his probation. The State argues that Dejesus' claim is moot because he pled guilty to one count of possession with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases