1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 970 A.2d
  5. 970 A.2d 244 (2009)
 

HICKLIN v. ONYX ACCEPTANCE CORP.

No. 317, 2008.

970 A.2d 244 (2009)

Shannon P. HICKLIN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. ONYX ACCEPTANCE CORP., Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: March 27, 2009.

Reargument Denied: April 22, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas A. Shachtman, Esquire, Douglas A. Shachtman & Associates, Wilmington, for Appellant.

Jeffrey P. Wasserman and Daniel C. Kerrick (argued), Esquires, of Ciconte, Wasserman & Scerba, LLC, Wilmington, for Appellee.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.

JACOBS, Justice:

Shannon P. Hicklin, the defendant below, appeals from a Superior Court order affirming a deficiency judgment of the Court of Common Pleas arising from the repossession and sale of a car financed by the plaintiff below, Onyx Acceptance Corporation ("Onyx"). On appeal, Hicklin argues that the Superior Court erroneously upheld the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, because the trial court: (1) applied an incorrect standard in determining the commercial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases