1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 953 A.2d
  5. 953 A.2d 713 (2008)
 

HOAG v. AMEX ASSURANCE CO.

No. 461, 2007.

953 A.2d 713 (2008)

Ralph HOAG, Plaintiff Below-Appellant, v. AMEX ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant Below-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: July 21, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth F. Carmine (argued), Esquire, of Potter, Carmine & Associates, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware for appellants.

Stephen P. Casarino (argued), Esquire, of Casarino, Christman & Shalk, Wilmington, Delaware for appellee.

Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices.

RIDGELY, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant Ralph Hoag ("Mr. Hoag") appeals the Superior Court's dismissal of his uninsured motorist claim against Amex Assurance Co. ("Amex") as a sanction for his failure to provide discovery as ordered by the trial court. On appeal, Mr. Hoag argues that dismissal was too extreme and constituted an abuse of discretion. We find no merit to his appeal and affirm.

I. Facts

In January of 2002, Mr. Hoag and his wife, Angela...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases