BOOZ ALLEN v. OFFICE OF TAX & REVENUE

No. 21-AA-0575.

308 A.3d 1205 (2024)

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC., Petitioner, v. District of Columbia OFFICE OF TAX AND REVENUE, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided February 8, 2024.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catherine M.A. Carroll , Washington, DC, with whom Ronald C. Machen , Hillary S. Smith , Washington, DC, Elena M. Satten-Lopez , and Philip M. Tatarowicz , Washington, DC, were on the brief, for petitioner Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.

Jeremy R. Girton , Assistant Attorney General, with whom Karl A. Racine , Attorney General for the District of Columbia at the time the brief was filed, Caroline S. Van Zile , Solicitor General, Ashwin P. Phatak , Principal Deputy Solicitor General, and Graham E. Phillips , Deputy Solicitor General, were on the brief, for respondent.

Before Beckwith and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Fisher, Senior Judge.


Petitioner Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. ("BAH") challenges a determination that BAH was ineligible for certain tax benefits. We affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

Except as noted, the following facts appear to be undisputed for present purposes. The dispute at issue in this case involves taxes paid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases