TARRIO v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 21-CF-615 & 21-CM-616.

282 A.3d 86 (2022)

Henry TARRIO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided September 8, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lucas I. Dansie , Washington, DC, was on the brief for appellant.

Matthew M. Graves , United States Attorney, and Chrisellen R. Kolb , John P. Mannarino , Paul V. Courtney , and Daniel J. Lenerz , Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief for appellee.

Before Glickman, Easterly, and Deahl, Associate Judges.


Appellant Henry Tarrio contends the trial judge who presided over his guilty pleas and sentencing should have recused himself sua sponte due to facts giving rise to an impermissible appearance of bias. Appellant asserts the appearance of bias arose from the judge's past relationship

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases