Per Curiam:
In this case, the Board on Professional Responsibility concurred with many of the findings of the Hearing Committee and determined by clear and convincing evidence that respondent had violated Rules 3.4(c), 8.1(b), and 8.4(d) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct. The Board agreed with the Committee's recommendation that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.