1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 241 A.3d
  5. 241 A.3d 222 (2020)
 

FDS RESTAURANT, INC. v. ALL PLUMBING INC.

No. 16-CV-1009.

241 A.3d 222 (2020)

FDS RESTAURANT, INC., Appellant, v. ALL PLUMBING INC., Service, Parts Installation, et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided March 26, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan B. Piper , with whom Phillip A. Bock , and Chicago and Stephen H. Ring , Germantown, were on the brief, for appellant.

Molly A. Arranz , Chicago, with whom Tamara B. Goorevitz , Baltimore and Michael L. Resis , Chicago, were on the brief, for appellees.

Before Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge, and Glickman and Fisher, Associate Judges.

This case requires us to construe the so-called "junk fax" provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ("TCPA")1 and its implementing regulation,2 which restrict the sending of unsolicited advertisements via facsimile machine. In particular...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases