1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 164 A.3d
  5. 164 A.3d 66 (2017)
 

COOPER v. STARBUCKS COFFEE CORP.

No. 15-AA-476.

164 A.3d 66 (2017)

Omar COOPER, Petitioner, v. STARBUCKS COFFEE CORPORATION, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided June 6, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weyinmi Shekoni , Student Attorney (No. 14599), Sempian Sooriakumar , Student Attorney (No. 14600), and Elliott S. Milstein , Supervising Attorney, were on the brief for petitioner.

Before Beckwith and Mcleese, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, Senior Judge.

Starbucks Coffee Corporation ("Starbucks"), respondent, terminated Omar Cooper, petitioner, due to his admitted use of profane language and alleged pushing of a co-worker, Deniene Sanders. Mr. Cooper, represented by student attorneys, challenges whether the Office of Administrative Hearings ("OAH") erred in ruling that he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases