1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 111 A.3d
  5. 111 A.3d 1 (2014)
 

SMITH v. U.S.

Nos. 12-CM-1742, 12-CM-1743.

111 A.3d 1 (2014)

Kim E. SMITH, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided December 4, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cynthia Nordone for appellant.

Jay Apperson , Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Ronald Machen Jr. , United States Attorney, and John P. Mannarino and Elizabeth Trosman , Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY and BECKWITH, Associate Judges, and KING, Senior Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether the exclusionary rule applies to derivative evidence? resulting from an arrest warrant that was premised upon tainted evidence obtained during an illegal traffic stop.1

We hold that where an officer's mistake of law leads to a warrant premised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases