WORTHY v. U.S.

No. 13-CF-741.

100 A.3d 1095 (2014)

Julius L. WORTHY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 9, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Justin Murray , Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein , Public Defender Service, was on the brief, for appellant.

Margaret Barr , Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Ronald C. Machen Jr. , United States Attorney, and Elizabeth Trosman and Michael Marando , Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY and BECKWITH, Associate Judges, and STEADMAN, Senior Judge.


STEADMAN, Senior Judge:

Appellant Julius L. Worthy, convicted at a bench trial of assault and attempted threats,1 challenges the introduction of a prior consistent statement made by the victim relating to threats made by appellant. We conclude that under the circumstances of this case, the prior consistent statement was properly admitted into evidence.

Facts

This case arose out of a family quarrel between Worthy and his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases