1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 99 A.3d
  5. 99 A.3d 714 (2014)
 

IN RE SMITH

Nos. 12-PR-436, 12-PR-1582.

99 A.3d 714 (2014)

In re Edward T. SMITH; Bruce E. Gardner, Appellant.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided September 18, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce E. Gardner, pro se.

Irvin B. Nathan , Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Todd S. Kim , Solicitor General, Donna M. Murasky , Deputy Solicitor General, and Stacy L. Anderson , Senior Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for the District of Columbia.

Before FISHER and EASTERLY, Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Senior Judge.

FISHER, Associate Judge:

Appellant Bruce E. Gardner challenges the denial of his requests for compensation, claiming that because he was appointed as "conservator" of Edward T. Smith after D.C.Code § 21-1501 had been repealed and because he performed the duties of a guardian and conservator as described in D.C.Code §§ 21-2047 and 21-2070 (the Guardianship Act), he is eligible to receive compensation from the Guardianship Fund. We conclude that Mr. Gardner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases