BARTHOLOMEW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF TAX AND REVENUE

No. 12-AA-169.

78 A.3d 309 (2013)

Desmond BARTHOLOMEW, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF TAX AND REVENUE, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 24, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Desmond Bartholomew, pro se.

Bradley A. Sarnell , Assistant Attorney General, with whom Irvin B. Nathan , Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Todd S. Kim , Solicitor General, and Donna M. Murasky , Deputy Solicitor General, were on brief, for respondent.

Before BECKWITH and McLEESE, Associate Judges, and RUIZ, Senior Judge.


RUIZ, Senior Judge.

Petitioner, Desmond Bartholomew, brings this appeal against the District of Columbia Office of Tax and Revenue (OTR), claiming that the OTR erroneously determined that he was a domiciliary of the District of Columbia for tax purposes and that he was not a bona fide resident of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) during 2003 and 2004, making him subject to taxation in the District of Columbia in those years. He also claims that the amount of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases