1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 43 A.3d
  5. 43 A.3d 327 (2012)
 

NADER v. SERODY

No. 09-CV-906.

43 A.3d 327 (2012)

Ralph NADER, Appellant, v. Linda S. SERODY, et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided May 10, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oliver B. Hall for appellant.

Nathan R. Fennessy , with whom Daniel I. Booker and Douglas K. Spaulding , Washington, DC, were on the brief, for appellees.

Before GLICKMAN and THOMPSON, Associate Judges, and RUIZ, Associate Judge, Retired.

RUIZ, Associate Judge, Retired:

Ralph Nader challenges the trial court's denial of his Rule 60(b) and Rule 41(b) motions to set aside a Pennsylvania judgment that appellees sought to enforce in the District of Columbia. We affirm the judgment of the trial court enforcing the Pennsylvania judgment, as consistent with the principles of the Full Faith and Credit Clause.

I. Procedural Posture

This case arrived at the doorstep of the Superior Court after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases