Appellant T.R. challenges the trial court's jurisdiction to conduct neglect and custody proceedings regarding her child, J.R., as well as the trial court's ultimate finding that J.R. was a "neglected child" under D.C.Code § 16-2301(9)(A)(ii) (2002 Supp.). Appellant specifically argues that: (1) the court lacked jurisdiction to issue a pre-petition custody order over J.R.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN RE J.R.
No. 10-FS-38.
33 A.3d 397 (2011)
In re J.R.; T.R., Appellant.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued February 22, 2011.
Decided December 22, 2011.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Tobey K. Oliver , Assistant Attorney General for the District of Columbia, with whom Peter J. Nickles , Attorney General for the District of Columbia at the time of argument, Todd S. Kim , Solicitor General, and Donna M. Murasky , Deputy Solicitor General, were on the brief, for appellee District of Columbia.
Dennis Eshman , Guardian Ad Litem for J.R.
Gary Jacobs , for appellee J.B., filed a statement joining the briefs of appellee District of Columbia and the Guardian Ad Litem.
Before BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY and THOMPSON, Associate Judges, and RUIZ, Associate Judge, Retired.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
