1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 25 A.3d
  5. 25 A.3d 905 (2011)
 

IN RE SHURTZ

No. 09-BG-617.

25 A.3d 905 (2011)

In re David L. SHURTZ, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided August 4, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George R. Clark , Washington, DC, for respondent.

William R. Ross , Assistant Bar Counsel, with whom Wallace E. Shipp, Jr. , Bar Counsel, and Joseph C. Perry , Senior Staff Attorney, were on the brief, for the Office of Bar Counsel.

Before GLICKMAN and FISHER, Associate Judges, and NEWMAN, Senior Judge.

FISHER, Associate Judge:

Following an evidentiary hearing, the Circuit Court for Arlington County, Virginia, found, by clear and convincing evidence, that respondent had violated Rules 1.4(b) and (c), Rule 1.8(e), and Rules 8.4(b) and (c) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. We will not repeat the details of respondent's misconduct, which are described in the Circuit Court's Memorandum Order, attached to this opinion as an Appendix. The Circuit Court suspended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases