1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 6 A.3d
  5. 6 A.3d 860 (2010)
 

MARTIN v. ROSS

No. 09-CV-460.

6 A.3d 860 (2010)

LaJuan F. MARTIN, et al., Appellants, v. Andrew ROSS, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 28, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LaJuan F. Martin , pro se.

Edward R. Kump , Washington, DC, was on the brief for appellee.

Before KRAMER and THOMPSON, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior Judge.

NEBEKER, Senior Judge:

A jury found appellants LaJuan Martin, Lolita Martin, and Martin & James, LLP, liable for legal malpractice after the Martins' failure to respond to a deadline resulted in the dismissal of appellee Andrew Ross's employment discrimination case. The Martins now appeal that verdict, arguing that (1) no reasonable factfinder could have found that Ross would have succeeded on his claim but for the Martins' negligence, (2) Ross's expert witness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases