IN RE ESTATE OF BERNSTEIN

Nos. 08-PR-1294, 08-PR-1400, 09-PR-530.

3 A.3d 337 (2010)

In re ESTATE OF Ruth F. BERNSTEIN; David M. Albert, Appellant.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided September 2, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katherine M. Wiedmann , with whom Christopher G. Hoge , Washington, DC, was on the brief, for the appellant/cross-appellee David Albert.

Daniel S. Koch , with whom Glenn M. Cooper , Bethesda, MD, was on the brief, for the appellees/cross-appellants Bruce D. Burtoff, M.D. and Susan S. Burtoff .

Before WASHINGTON, Chief Judge, FISHER, Associate Judge, and PRYOR, Senior Judge.


WASHINGTON, Chief Judge:

This case comes to us after almost ten years of legal wrangling primarily surrounding the question of whether David M. Albert and his counsel were properly denied compensation for litigation expenses arising from Mr. Albert's efforts to administer the estate of Ruth F. Bernstein. For the reasons articulated below, we find that Mr. Albert is entitled to remuneration for the estate litigation expenses because he pursued the litigation in good...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases