1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 2 A.3d
  5. 2 A.3d 222 (2010)
 

DORSEY v. U.S.

No. 06-CF-1099.

2 A.3d 222 (2010)

James A. DORSEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided August 19, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mikel-Meredith Weidman, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein and Samia Fam, were on the brief, for appellant.

Elizabeth H. Danello, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Jeffrey A. Taylor, United States Attorney at the time the brief was filed, and Roy W. McLeese III, Mary B. McCord, and Jonathan Haray, Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before REID, GLICKMAN and THOMPSON, Associate Judges.

REID, Associate Judge:

The government concedes that during the first phase of police interrogation of appellant, James A. Dorsey, "the police violated the prophylactic rule articulated in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981)" by not stopping the interrogation when Mr....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases