1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 302 A.3d
  5. 302 A.3d 850 (2023)
 

AHMED v. OAK MANAGEMENT CORP.

(SC 20677).

302 A.3d 850 (2023)

348 Conn. 152

Iftikar AHMED v. OAK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially Released October 17, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory Dubinsky , pro hac vice, with whom were Zachary J. Phillipps , Stamford, Andrew Chang , pro hac vice, and, on the brief, Vincent Levy , pro hac vice, and Daniel M. Young , Stamford, for the appellant (plaintiff).

David K. Momborquette , pro hac vice, with whom was David T. Grudberg , New Haven, for the appellee (defendant).

Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D'Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Alexander and Prescott, Js.

This appeal arises under highly unusual, perhaps unprecedented, circumstances, involving the application of the "fugitive disentitlement doctrine"1 in an arbitral proceeding but implicates settled law on the limits of judicial review of arbitral awards. The plaintiff, Iftikar Ahmed, appeals

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases