WINE v. MULLIGAN

(AC 44261).

277 A.3d 912 (2022)

213 Conn.App. 298

Daniel WINE v. William MULLIGAN et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released June 14, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Wine, self-represented, the appellant (plaintiff).

Jacob McChesney , with whom, on the brief, were William Tong , attorney general, and Clare E. Kindall , solicitor general, for the appellees (defendants).

Alexander, Suarez and Sheldon, Js.


The self-represented plaintiff, Daniel Wine, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted the defendants'1 motion to strike his complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff contends that the court erred in granting this motion because the stricken complaint adequately stated a claim that the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases