DININO v. FEDERAL EXP. CORP.

(AC 38798).

169 A.3d 303 (2017)

176 Conn.App. 248

Quintino DININO, Jr. v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, et. al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released September 12, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana M. Hrelic , with whom was Kimberly A. Knox , and, on the brief, James J. Walker , for the appellants (named plaintiff).

Brian Tetreault , with whom, on the brief, was Cristin E. Sheehan , for the appellee (named defendant).

Laura Pascale Zaino , with whom, on the brief, were Kevin M. Roche , Rachel J. Fain , and Logan A. Forsey , for the appellee (defendant Ernest Hawkins).

Alvord, Prescott and Pellegrino, Js.


It is well established that the Workers' Compensation Act, General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. (act), provides the exclusive remedy for most workers injured in the course of their employment. This appeal arises out of an action by the plaintiff, Quintino DiNino, Jr., in which he alleges that his employer, Federal Express Corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases