BIFOLCK v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC.

SC 19310.

152 A.3d 1183 (2016)

324 Conn. 402

Vincent BIFOLCK, Executor (Estate of Jeanette D. Bifolck), et al. v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released December 29, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Golub , with whom were Jonathan M. Levine and, on the brief, Marilyn J. Ramos , for the appellants (plaintiffs).

John C. Massaro , with whom were Francis H. Morrison III and, on the brief, Anthony J. Franze , pro hac vice, John B. Daukas , pro hac vice, John M. Tanksi and Michael K. Murray , for the appellee (defendant).

Jonathan M. Hoffman , pro hac vice, Cristin E. Sheehan and Kaelah M. Smith filed a brief for the Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., as amicus curiae.

Daniel S. Rawner and Kenneth J. Parsigian , pro hac vice, filed a brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America as amicus curiae.

George Jepsen , attorney general, Gregory T. D'Auria , solicitor general, and Phillip Rosario , Jonathan J. Blake and Thomas J. Saadi, assistant attorneys general, filed a brief for the state of Connecticut et al. as amici curiae.

John J. Robinson and Cullen W. Guilmartin filed a brief for the Connecticut Defense Lawyers Association as amicus curiae.

Randall L. Goodden filed a brief for the International Product Safety and Liability Prevention Association as amicus curiae.

Jennifer M. DelMonico , Proloy K. Das , Eric B. Miller and Terence J. Brunau filed a brief for the Connecticut Business and Industry Association et al. as amici curiae.

Brenden P. Leydon filed a brief for the Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association as amicus curiae.

Larry A. Tawwater , Alinor Sterling and Jeffrey R. White filed a brief for the American Association for Justice as amicus curiae.

Michael G. Rigg filed a brief for Aaron D. Twerski et al. as amici curiae.

Rogers, C. J., and Zarella, Eveleigh, McDonald, Espinosa, Robinson and Vertefeuille, Js.


This case is the second of two diversity actions in which the federal courts certified questions for this court's advice regarding the viability of an action under Connecticut's Product Liability Act (act)1 alleging that a cigarette's design had increased consumers' risk of cancer. The courts sought advice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases