BROCHU v. AESYS TECHNOLOGIES

No. 36483.

123 A.3d 1236 (2015)

159 Conn.App. 584

Adrienne BROCHU, Executrix (Estate of Adrien Brochu) v. AESYS TECHNOLOGIES et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided September 8, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc P. Kunen , pro hac vice, with whom were Robert M. Cheverie , and, on the brief, Dino G. Galardi , pro hac vice, for the appellant (substitute plaintiff).

Patrick J. Glinka , Hartford, with whom, on the brief, was Kimberly Hammond , for the appellee (defendant Crane Co.).

James A. Hall , with whom, on the brief, was James R. Oswald , for the appellee (defendant Foster Wheeler Corp.).

Kevin C. McCaffrey , for the appellee (defendant Goulds Pumps, Inc.).

GRUENDEL, SHELDON and PRESCOTT, Js.


In this appeal, the primary issue is whether, following the death of the original plaintiff, an unjustified delay of more than four years in substituting a representative of the decedent's estate as the party plaintiff supports the trial court's dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute with due diligence. A few weeks prior to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases