1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 123 A.3d
  5. 123 A.3d 21 (2015)
 

STUART v. BLUMENTHAL

No. 35870.

123 A.3d 21 (2015)

159 Conn.App. 43

Mark STUART v. Richard BLUMENTHAL, Attorney General, et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided August 4, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick Tomasiewicz , Hartford, with whom was Mario Cerame , for the appellant (petitioner).

James M. Ralls , assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Gail P. Hardy , state's attorney, and John Fahey , senior assistant state's attorney, for the appellees (respondents).

SHELDON, KELLER and LAVERY, Js.

The petitioner, Mark Stuart, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his amended petition for a new trial. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his petition on the ground that he had failed to establish an "other reasonable cause" to grant his petition pursuant to General...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases