PRESCOTT, J.
The defendant, Michael Perugini, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for the return of seized property. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that he was not entitled to the return of seized property because he lacked a valid ownership or security interest in it sufficient to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.