PER CURIAM.
In this appeal from the habeas court's judgment denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner, Martin V., claims that the court's judgment was erroneous. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
In the underlying criminal prosecution, the petitioner was convicted, after jury trial, of two counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2), one count of sexual assault...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.