1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 84 A.3d
  5. 84 A.3d 828 (2014)
 

CRUZ v. VISUAL PERCEPTIONS, LLC

No. 19015.

84 A.3d 828 (2014)

311 Conn. 93

Norma I. CRUZ v. VISUAL PERCEPTIONS, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided February 11, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David R. Makarewicz , Hartford, with whom was Richard D. Carella , Middletown, for the appellants (defendants).

Proloy K. Das , with whom was Andrew L. Houlding , Hartford, for the appellee (plaintiff).

ROGERS, C.J., and PALMER, ZARELLA, EVELEIGH, McDONALD, ESPINOSA and VERTEFEUILLE, Js.

ROGERS, C.J.

The issue that we must resolve in this certified appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that a letter agreement between the parties plainly and unambiguously constituted a contract for a defined period of time or, instead, the letter agreement reasonably could be interpreted as governing the terms and conditions of the plaintiff's at-will employment.1 The plaintiff,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases