1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 74 A.3d
  5. 74 A.3d 1192 (2013)
 

INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES v. SUMMIT ASSOCIATES, INC.

No. 18910.

74 A.3d 1192 (2013)

309 Conn. 840

INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES v. SUMMIT ASSOCIATES, INC., et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided August 27, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Proloy K. Das , with whom was Bernard F. Gaffney , Hartford, for the appellant (defendant Joseph D. Lancia).

Pasquale Young , New Haven, for the appellee (plaintiff).

ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, PALMER, ZARELLA, EVELEIGH, McDONALD and ESPINOSA, Js.

McDONALD, J.

In 2009, our legislature created a mechanism whereby a judgment creditor can "revive" an unsatisfied judgment for money damages at any time before the period for enforcement expires; Public Acts 2009, No. 09-215, § 1(c) (P.A. 09-215); see General Statutes § 52-598(c);1 the purpose of which was to aid in the execution of such judgments in foreign jurisdictions. The present...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases