NASH v. STEVENS

No. 33958.

71 A.3d 635 (2013)

144 Conn.App. 1

Carol Ann NASH et al. v. Betsey N. STEVENS et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided July 9, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sheila J. Hall , with whom, on the brief, was Lawrence C. Sgrignari , Hamden, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Timothy W. Crowley , New Haven, for the appellee (named defendant).

Philip C. Pires , with whom was Barbara M. Schellenberg , Bridgeport, for the appellee (defendant Evelene N. Rabou).

DiPENTIMA, C.J., and ALVORD and LAVERY, Js.


DiPENTIMA, C.J.

The plaintiff, Carol Ann Nash, appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, Betsey N. Stevens and Evelene N. Rabou.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment as a result of (1) its misapplication of General Statutes § 47-33a and (2) its failure to consider the intent of the parties in its analysis of § 47-33a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases