SIMMS v. SEAMAN

No. 18839.

69 A.3d 880 (2013)

308 Conn. 523

Robert SIMMS v. Penny Q. SEAMAN et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 21, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Williams , New Haven, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Patrick M. Noonan , Guilford, with whom were William H. Prout, Jr. , New Haven, and, on the brief, Matthew H. Geelan , for the appellee (named defendant).

Nadine M. Pare , Cheshire, for the appellees (defendant Kenneth J. Bartschi et al.).

Raymond J. Plouffe, Jr. , Shelton, for the appellee (defendant Susan A. Moch).

Arnold H. Rutkin , Westport, and Alexander J. Cuda filed a brief for the Connecticut Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers as amicus curiae.

ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, PALMER, ZARELLA, EVELEIGH and VERTEFEUILLE, Js.


ZARELLA, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether attorneys are protected by the common-law doctrine of absolute immunity1 against claims of fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress2 arising out of their conduct during judicial proceedings.3 The plaintiff, Robert Simms, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases