1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 70 A.3d
  5. 70 A.3d 104 (2013)
 

GIANETTI v. RUTKIN

No. 34045.

70 A.3d 104 (2013)

142 Conn.App. 641

Charles D. GIANETTI v. David RUTKIN et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 21, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Rutkin, Bridgeport, filed a brief for the appellants (defendants).

Charles D. Gianetti, pro se, the appellee (plaintiff) filed a brief.

DiPENTIMA, C.J., and LAVINE and BEACH, Js.

BEACH, J.

This case raises the spectre of "balance billing," a practice by which the healthcare provider seeks to recover from the patient the difference between the self-determined value of the provider's services and the amount provided for in the contract between the provider and the health maintenance organization. Although balance billing generally has not been countenanced,1 in this case the physician had no

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases