IN RE KAMAL R.

No. 35080.

62 A.3d 1177 (2013)

142 Conn.App. 66

In re KAMAL R.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 3, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas F. Mitola , Shelton, for the appellant (respondent father).

Renee Bevacqua Bollier , assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were George Jepsen , attorney general, and Susan T. Pearlman and Benjamin Zivyon , assistant attorneys general, for the appellee (petitioner).

Natasha White , for the minor child.

DiPENTIMA, C.J., and BEAR and FLYNN, Js.


PER CURIAM.

The respondent father1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his son, Kamal R. On appeal, the sole issue is whether the court properly found that the department of children and families (department), had made reasonable efforts to reunite the respondent with Kamal. We conclude that the court's finding was proper and, therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases