1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 62 A.3d
  5. 62 A.3d 637 (2013)
 

IN RE PAUL O.

No. 35082.

62 A.3d 637 (2013)

141 Conn.App. 477

In re PAUL O.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 8, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Day , for the appellant (respondent father).

Frank H. LaMonaca , assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were George Jepsen , attorney general, and Benjamin Zivyon, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner).

Nhi Tran , for the minor child.

BEACH, ALVORD and PELLEGRINO, Js.

PER CURIAM.

The respondent father appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights as to his minor child, Paul O.1 On appeal, the respondent challenges as clearly erroneous the court's findings that (1) the department of children and families (department) made reasonable efforts to reunite the child with him and (2) the respondent was unwilling or unable to benefit from the department's services to facilitate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases