BEAR, J.
The defendant, Bradshaw Smith, appeals from the judgment of conviction of one count of permitting a dog to roam at large in violation of General Statutes § 22-364(a). On appeal, the defendant claims that § 22-364(a) is void for vagueness and that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The basic facts are not in dispute. On July 16, 2010, the defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
