1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 50 A.3d
  5. 50 A.3d 324 (2012)
 

HIRSCHFELD v. MACHINIST

No. 33561.

50 A.3d 324 (2012)

137 Conn.App. 690

Caroline HIRSCHFELD v. Robert B. MACHINIST.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided August 28, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph T. O'Connor , Stamford, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Kenneth J. Bartschi , Hartford, with whom were Dana M. Hrelic , and, on the brief, Arnold Rutkin , Westport, for the appellee (defendant).

GRUENDEL, BEACH and SCHALLER, Js.

SCHALLER, J.

The plaintiff, Caroline Hirschfeld, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting her motion for contempt and ordering the defendant, Robert B. Machinist, to pay an additional $36,959 in alimony for the 2007 taxable year and $17,731.97 in attorney's fees.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court incorrectly interpreted a provision in the separation agreement and, in doing so, improperly restricted the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases