1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 46 A.3d
  5. 46 A.3d 59 (2012)
 

IN RE JOSEPH W.

Nos. 18951, 18952.

46 A.3d 59 (2012)

305 Conn. 633

In re JOSEPH W., Jr., et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 28, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Rozwaski , for the appellant in Docket No. SC 18951 (respondent mother).

David J. Reich , for the appellant in Docket No. SC 18952 (respondent father).

Stephen G. Vitelli , assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was George Jepsen , attorney general, for the appellee in both cases (petitioner).

ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, PALMER, ZARELLA, EVELEIGH, HARPER and VERTEFEUILLE, Js.

ROGERS, C.J.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the trial court applied the proper standard of proof when, pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-129, it rendered adjudications of neglect under the doctrine of predictive neglect. The respondents, Karin H. (mother) and Joseph W., Sr. (father), are the parents of Joseph W., Jr., and Daniel W. (children). The petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner), filed neglect petitions with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases