1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 46 A.3d
  5. 46 A.3d 102 (2012)
 

KELLER v. BECKENSTEIN

No. 18689.

46 A.3d 102 (2012)

305 Conn. 523

Jonathan M. KELLER et al. v. Roz-Lynn BECKENSTEIN, Executrix (Estate of Robert J. Beckenstein).

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 26, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard P. Weinstein , Hartford, with whom was Nathan A. Schatz , for the appellants-appellees (plaintiffs).

Michael P. Berman , with whom was Suzanne LaPlante , Hartford, for the appellee-appellant (defendant).

ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, PALMER, ZARELLA, McLACHLAN, EVELEIGH and VERTEFEUILLE, Js.

ZARELLA, J.

This certified appeal and cross appeal involve an issue of subject matter jurisdiction and statutory interpretation. The plaintiffs, Jonathan M. Keller and a group of business entities (Keller group),1 argue that the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over their complaint in this case, even though the underlying vexatious litigation claim against the defendant, Roz-Lynn Beckenstein, executrix of the estate of Robert...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases