1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 44 A.3d
  5. 44 A.3d 883 (2012)
 

MAYO v. ADMIN., UNEMP. COMPENSATION ACT

No. 33454.

44 A.3d 883 (2012)

136 Conn.App. 298

Alfred P. MAYO v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 19, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred P. Mayo , pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

Richard T. Sponzo , assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were George Jepsen , attorney general, and Philip M. Schulz , assistant attorney general, for the appellee (defendant).

BEAR, ESPINOSA and BISHOP, Js.

PER CURIAM.

The self-represented plaintiff, Alfred P. Mayo, appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his appeal from a decision of the employment security board of review (board). On appeal, the plaintiff asserts procedural claims regarding the fairness of the hearing before the appeals referee.1 He also claims, on the merits, that the appeals referee's decision denying him unemployment compensation benefits was incorrect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases