LI LI v. CANBERRA INDUSTRIES

No. 32744.

39 A.3d 789 (2012)

134 Conn.App. 448

LI LI v. CANBERRA INDUSTRIES et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 27, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Li Li , pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

T. Christopher Donnelly , pro hac vice, with whom was James C. Graham , New Haven, and, on the brief, Jeffrey M. Ernst , pro hac vice, and Daniel J. Klau , Hartford, for the appellees (defendants).

GRUENDEL, BEACH and FLYNN, Js.


BEACH, J.

The self-represented plaintiff, Li Li, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Canberra Industries, Packard BioScience (Packard), Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Darren Lee, Roberta Tyska (formerly Roberta Kuhn), Mark Schmeizl, Wayne Richardson, Eugene Della Vecchia, Richard McKernan and Emery G. Olcott. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred in granting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases